In software development, micromanagement and favoritism can suppress creativity and reduce team morale, often fueled by office politics. These practices can lead to unequal opportunities and a toxic work environment, undermining productivity and innovation.
Revisit the software development process.
In reality, we do waterfall in each module or sprint😊
Agile basically comes into picture when the initial phase of the project is delivered.
In an ongoing process after post production, agile is the way.
Scrum doesn't actually needed as jargon, but an initial meeting alternate standup, review are enough and will be a part.
Only draw back is show casing individuals suppressing the team is worse.😂
The lowering or low branding of team members in the standup even by a gesture word, email all affects the productivity.
The actual team is mostly rejected in tech meetings, or no access to management even once in 2 months, are lose points.
The opinions or technical aspects are avoided and neglected for the sake of office politics is another issue.
So who is the asshole?
While Agile can improve post-production work, micromanagement and favoritism hurt team unity and output. Ignoring team input and sidelining members in meetings worsen these problems, damaging creativity and morale.
In Agile software development, where suppression, favoritism, and office politics often prevail, patience is essential. Burnout and frustration can exhaust us, but patience helps us persevere. Despite the mental toll of arrogance and favoritism, patience enables us to move forward, fostering team growth and stability in a challenging environment.
Comments
Post a Comment