Skip to main content

Ui vs api

 In a data-rich engineering web app where GraphQL is used for data retrieval, the time ratio between API development and UI development can vary based on several factors:


1. Data Complexity:If the data structures are complex or have varying relationships, more time might be spent on API development to ensure efficient querying and data retrieval.


2. UI Customization Needs: When the UI requires extensive customization for each section or table, additional time might be allocated to UI development to ensure each component meets specific requirements.


3. Integration Challenges:Bridging the gap between the GraphQL responses and UI components, especially in scenarios where components cannot be easily reused, can significantly impact the time spent on integration efforts.


4. Functionality and User Interactions: If the application involves complex user interactions, form handling, validations, or real-time updates, a considerable amount of time may be dedicated to implementing these features in the UI layer.


5. Testing and Optimization:Both the API and UI layers require thorough testing, but the complexity and breadth of the UI might demand more time for testing and optimization. 

Let's delve into the statistics and a more detailed example of an engineering data app with multi-level JSON data, emphasizing the UI complexities:


Development Time Breakdown:


- UI Development Time: Reports suggest UI/UX development often consumes about 50-70% of the total project time for applications handling complex data structures. This includes creating components, managing state, and ensuring data flow between parent-child components.


- Backend (GraphQL API) Time: Meanwhile, GraphQL API development typically accounts for 20-30% of the total time. This phase focuses on schema design, resolvers, and ensuring efficient data retrieval.


Example: Engineering Data App - Multi-level JSON Data:


Imagine an engineering monitoring dashboard powered by GraphQL. It presents hierarchical data structures like equipment, subsystems, and sensor readings.


- UI Complexity:

   - Nested Components:Representing multi-level JSON data involves creating nested components to display different levels of information. For instance, a dashboard might contain equipment cards showing subsystems, and each subsystem might have sensor data visualization components.

   

   - Data Communication:Ensuring seamless communication between parent and child components to populate and update data accurately requires intricate state management and event handling.


- GraphQL Integration:

   - GraphQL Queries:Utilizing GraphQL queries to fetch hierarchical data can simplify data retrieval. However, mapping this data effectively onto various UI components requires meticulous handling to match each component's requirements.


Impact on User Experience and Business:


- User Experience: A well-designed UI that effectively translates complex data into intuitive visualizations ensures engineers can swiftly comprehend critical information, reducing the risk of errors and improving decision-making.


- Business Impact:A subpar UI that fails to efficiently display multi-level engineering data may lead to confusion or misinterpretation, potentially impacting operational efficiency or even safety protocols. Conversely, a user-friendly interface significantly enhances productivity and reduces the likelihood of errors.


In engineering applications dealing with multi-level JSON data, UI development takes precedence due to its intricacies in handling nested components and ensuring smooth data communication. While GraphQL aids in data retrieval, it's the effective translation of this data into an intuitive interface that truly elevates user experience, impacting the success of the application in critical operational settings.

As a generalized estimate, in data-rich engineering web apps leveraging GraphQL, the time ratio might lean towards spending slightly more time on UI development and integration (potentially around 1.5x to 2x) compared to the API development phase. However, this ratio can significantly vary based on the specific project's requirements, complexities, and the team's expertise in GraphQL, Angular, and overall application development.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Micro Front and ui frameworks

 To mix technologies in a micro front-end architecture, where different parts of the application use different frameworks or libraries, there are several ways to approach this, and the technologies you mentioned—Astro, Nuxt, Next, and Vite—can play a role. Here's how you can mix them, along with new approaches to micro front-end architecture:  Micro Front-End Architecture Overview Micro front-ends involve breaking a frontend application into smaller, independent pieces (micro-apps), where each micro-app can be developed, deployed, and maintained separately. These micro-apps can use different technologies (React, Angular, Vue, etc.) and are usually stitched together by a wrapper or container that manages the composition and communication between them.  Approaches to Micro Front-Ends with Modern Tech  1. Module Federation (Webpack 5)    - How it works: Module Federation allows multiple independent builds to dynamically share code. You can create different mic...
Post a Comment
Read more

Yes, I do mistakes!

Seriously, I am a human being and obviously, mistakes can happen. Why I am mentioning this story because to point the actual problem of the entire human society is EGO. As we are humans, and with multiple layer of emotions attached to each phase of his life, there is no room for a error less or mistake less life each day. But "diplomatically" it can be hide. The social engineering "conspiracies" [at least we can refer as it], team will make the 'ego' work in a group or individual.
Post a Comment
Read more

Alex, the techy

 In the realm of software engineering, where innovation and collaboration shaped the digital future, a compelling story unfolded, with Alex at its heart. Alex, a software engineer, possessed a unique spark that drew admiration from peers and outsiders alike. The corridors of the digital realm echoed with tales of Alex's prowess, his solutions whispered about like magical incantations. Yet, within the team's walls, this brilliance often went unrecognized, lost in the maze of office dynamics. As the team's head or manager looked on, Alex's potential was sadly underestimated. While he was seen as just another developer, outsiders saw the luminary he truly was. His intricate designs and elegant solutions were not just lines of code; they were glimpses into a mind teeming with creativity and vision. Beyond his coding talents, Alex possessed qualities that could transform him into an architect or even a project manager. His knack for seeing the bigger picture, understanding i...
Post a Comment
Read more